"A deficit on the scale currently implied would be unsustainable."
Institute for Fiscal Studies, response to the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland 2025-26 estimates, August 2026.
GERS answers a question nobody asks and is read out every August as the answer to the one everybody does, while its own pages show Scotland earning its keep to within two pounds a head.
The receipts
The source list for this chapter, as the publisher maintains it. Archive links are given wherever a cited page could move or die.
- GERS 2025-26: Scottish Government, "Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland 2025-26", published 12 August 2026, gov.scot, tables workbook computed directly: totals (£98.3bn revenue including £3.2bn North Sea; £123.6bn expenditure; net fiscal balance -£25.3bn, -10.9 per cent of GDP vs -4.2 for the UK); Table 1.2 (revenue per head £17,718 vs £17,720; onshore £17,150 vs £17,664; spending per head £22,281 vs £19,561); Table 1.3 (revenue lines and Scotland shares: VAT 8.95%, fuel 8.75%, tobacco 10.30%, non-domestic rates 9.49%, CGT 4.81%, inheritance 4.94%, reserved stamp duties 1.33%, income tax 6.68%; North Sea geographical £3,153m vs population-share £313m); Table 3.5 (spending by spending body: Scottish institutions £75.1bn / 60.8%; DWP-at-caseload £23.7bn; population-apportioned defence £5,229m + reserved debt interest £8,868m + international services £827m = £14.9bn / 12.1%); Table 3.9 (per-head aggregates); Table A.1 (population 7.98%); Table A.5 (survey-slice 95% confidence interval ±3.5%, ±1.1% of total revenue)., 8.
- GERS Methodology Publication 2025-26, expenditure and revenue methodology pages, gov.scot, pulled directly: defence, public sector debt interest and international services allocated by population share from PESA; "none of the expenditure associated with High Speed 2 is allocated to Scotland" (verbatim); identifiable/non-identifiable definitions..
- ONS Country and Regional Public Sector Finances, FYE 2025 (year 2024-25), supplementary tables, computed directly: Table S4 (net fiscal balance per head, all twelve, both North Sea treatments; Scotland £4,662 geographic / £5,238 population); Table S5 (revenue per head: Scotland £16,456 third of twelve; UK £16,437); Table S6 (spending per head: Scotland £21,117 highest; London £21,017; NI £20,866; UK gap £2,489); Table S9 (North Sea lines, for onshore revenue: Scotland £15,816 fourth of twelve); Table S12 (populations; England aggregate deficit £87.3bn / £1,489 per head and all absolute £bn figures computed). Regional aggregations in "The twelve columns" computed the same way (Table S4 per-head net fiscal balance, geographic basis, multiplied by Table S12 populations): London plus South East combined surplus £64.59bn; Scotland plus Wales plus Northern Ireland combined deficit £64.48bn; the seven English regions outside London and the South East £151.88bn, against the UK total £151.77bn. The book's own arithmetic on published figures; no ONS table prints these totals. Table S9 two-basis check, computed 24 August 2026, the book's own check of the published table: every labelled revenue row scanned; four lines, and only four, are published on two bases, once "Geographic" and once "Population" (petroleum revenue tax, offshore corporation tax, North Sea oil royalties and licence fees, the energy profits levy); every other revenue row carries a single basis..
- HM Treasury, Country and Regional Analysis 2025, workbooks computed directly: Table A.1a (identifiable expenditure on services £957.1bn; non-identifiable £210.3bn, about 18 per cent; London £138.3bn and Scotland £86.3bn identifiable, for the per-km² texture); Table A.6 (defence 94 per cent non-identifiable: £60,099m of £63,655m); Table A.8e (public transport capital per head, London higher than Scotland in each of the five published years, standing up the direction claim in "The basis of the bill"; the per-head series itself is printed in Chapter 20); Tables A.12 and A.15 (culture per head, London/Scotland/UK, 2020-21 to 2024-25); Table A.20 (identifiable expenditure per head excluding local government, index UK=100: Scotland 113, Wales 106, London 106, used as cross-check only; the table's own title is "UK identifiable expenditure excluding local government" and it must carry that label); CRA methodology workbook, DCMS rows, verbatim: Tate, Natural History Museum, V&A, Imperial War Museum, National Gallery "allocated using visitor survey data"..
- Cabinet Office, Civil Service Statistics 2026, published 29 July 2026, reference date 31 March 2026, statistical tables workbook read directly: Table 10 (London 107,810 of 557,825 civil servants, 19.3%; Scotland 57,800, 10.4%); Table 16 (Senior Civil Service by region: London 4,410 of 7,770, 56.8%; Scotland 515, 6.6%); Tables 7 and 16 (the grade-weighted paybill estimate, the book's own computation: national median salary per grade multiplied by regional headcount per grade, London 22.9%, Scotland 10.1%); Table 12 (Scottish Government 29,150 of Scotland's 57,800, 50.4%; DWP, HMRC and MOD 21,205 of the reserved 28,650, 74%). Population comparators: ONS mid-2024 estimates (UK 69,281,400; London 13.1%) and NRS mid-2024 (Scotland 5,546,900; 8.0%). Prior-year cross-check against Civil Service Statistics 2025 (London 19.5%, Scotland 10.3%; SCS shares 57.5%/6.4%)..ods..
- Hansard (Lords), 12 April 2022, HL7446: Lord Morris of Aberavon's question and Lord True (Minister of State, Cabinet Office) answering that there is "no central source of data" linking civil servants to pay conditions; pay and allowances below the Senior Civil Service delegated to individual departments since 1 April 1996..3.
- Cabinet Office, Places for Growth Role Relocation Data, Q2 2024, published 29 May 2025, Tables 1.1 to 1.3 read directly: 23,249 FTE roles relocated out of London cumulatively by Q2 2024, against the target of 22,000 by 2027; Scotland 2,434 FTE, 10.5 per cent, Glasgow City 1,784 and Edinburgh 453; Senior Civil Service 556 FTE, 2.4 per cent of all relocations.
- Cabinet Office, Places for Growth Formative Evaluation and Benefit Report, published 31 October 2024, pp. 19 (the 22,000-by-2027 target) and 51, verbatim: "policy functions are the hardest to relocate"; "the persistent London-centric culture of the Civil Service".
- UKRI, geographical distribution of funding report, 2023-24: London/South East/East 50% of funding; £183 per head inside vs £106 outside; Scotland £101; UKRI's own statement that 2023-24 was the first year it invested more outside the Greater South East than inside..5.
- Congressional Budget Office, Monthly Budget Review: Summary for Fiscal Year 2025: US deficit $1.8tn, 5.8% of GDP..
- Eurostat, euro-indicators news release, 22 April 2026 (first notification for 2025): France 5.1%, Italy 3.1%, EU 3.1%, euro area 2.9%, Spain 2.4%..
- House of Commons Library, "The budget deficit: a short guide" (SN06167): UK surpluses in five years only since 1970-71, none since 2000-01 (direct PDF pull outstanding, see Verification notes).
- ONS annual mid-year population estimates, mid-2022 bulletin: England 438 people per km², Scotland 70..
- Institute for Fiscal Studies, "2025-26 Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) estimates: IFS response", ifs.org.uk, August 2026: "a deficit on the scale currently implied would be unsustainable and require some combination of higher taxes or lower spending"; the deficit "largely reflects UK government decisions", "most notably, the relatively generous funding provided to the Scottish Government via the block grant", "rather than economic or budgetary mismanagement by the Scottish Government"; "the long-run structure of Scotland's economy and public finances could look very different post-independence". Wording double-search-corroborated; primary page 403'd (see Verification notes)..
- Richard Murphy: Scottish Parliament Official Report, Economy, Jobs and Fair Work Committee, Session 5, 23rd Meeting 2017, 19 September 2017, cols 21-24 (Economic Data inquiry); the accruals objection and, in exchange with Jackie Baillie MSP, the "couple of percentage points" answer with its hedges at col. 24. Read directly from the Official Report PDF..
- Alister Jack, gov.uk press release on GERS 2018-19, 21 August 2019: "a 'Union dividend' of nearly £2,000 a year"; "a £12.6 billion black hole at the centre of an independent Scotland's finances". Archived to Wayback this session..
- David Mundell, gov.uk press release on GERS 2017-18, 22 August 2018: being part of the UK "is worth nearly £1,900 for every single person in Scotland". Archived..
- Douglas Alexander, August 2026, on GERS 2025-26: "These statistics clearly demonstrate the value to people in Scotland of being part of a strong United Kingdom". Search-corroborated via Scotsman/inkl; primary gov.uk pull outstanding (see Verification notes)..
- Jenny Gilruth (Deputy First Minister and Finance Secretary), gov.scot release accompanying GERS 2025-26: GERS "provides notional estimates for Scotland's deficit as part of the UK"..
- HM Treasury, Green Book Review 2020: current appraisal practice "risks undermining" the aim of investment outside the south east. via.
- Stark, Gordon and Powell, "Rebalancing Our Cultural Capital", 31 October 2013 (self-funded, independent): London £68.99 per head of national arts and culture spending vs £4.58 for the rest of England, 2012-13. A London-against-rest-of-England comparison, never a Scotland figure, per registers/discarded-claims.md.
- National museums pot: £484m grant-in-aid, 13 of 15 London-sited, NAO, March 2026, via.
- HS2 northern-leg cancellation consequential: £321 million into Scotland's grant for 2024-25, Autumn Statement 2023 figures; Scottish Government FOI release 202300390934 (19 January 2024): HS2 sums cannot be isolated within the block grant.
- Holyrood's bar on borrowing for day-to-day (resource) spending: Scotland Act 2016 / Fiscal Framework (pin exact provision before print)..1.
- "Too wee, too poor, too stupid" untraceable to any named person's own words; used as the book's own description of an attitude, per registers/discarded-claims.md.
- HM Treasury, "UK debt and the Scotland independence referendum", January 2014, paras 1.1-1.2, read directly from the PDF: "in all circumstances honour the contractual terms of the debt issued by the UK Government"; "a share of the outstanding stock of debt instruments that have been issued by the UK would not be transferred to Scotland"; "The respective shares of debt and the terms of repayment would be subject to negotiation." Archived (Wayback, 24 Aug 2026)..
- UK Statistics Authority, Assessment Report 98, "Statistics on Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland", March 2011, "ASSESSMENT AND DESIGNATION" page, verbatim: designation "should not be interpreted to mean that the statistics are always correct"; assessment reports "will not normally comment further on a set of statistics, for example on their validity as social or economic measures". Also §1.3.1 (2007 Finance Committee session; "no evidence of ministerial interference"). Archived..
- Roy, G. and Spowage, M., "Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS): A look beyond nearly 30 years of controversy at what it does and doesn't tell us about Scotland", Scottish Affairs 30(4), 2021, pp. 423-449, doi 10.3366/scot.2021.0383. Quotes at pp. 3 ("not a set of audited financial accounts") and 11 (single-comparator weakness; "identifiable expenditure differences"); author note p. 1 (both formerly responsible for producing GERS); "a complete about turn" at pp. 6-7; Swinney and Macwhirter quotations at p. 7; Lang memo at p. 5, citing Wilson (1997). PDF read directly; archived..
- GERS Methodology Publication 2025-26, Quality Information and FAQ pages, verbatim caveats: "should not be interpreted as the 'net borrowing' of Scotland" (the formulation originates in ONS regional-accounts methodology; GERS carries its own version); "does not directly relate to the finances of the Scottish Government"; "Scotland as part of the current constitutional situation"; alcohol under-reporting "is known to be lower than actual consumption" with the proportional-consistency assumption. Expenditure methodology page, verbatim: "there are no CRA data currently available to estimate Scottish spending" (2025-26). "Notional net fiscal balance" confirmed as the 2025-26 edition's own term. All archived., 9.
- CPPR (University of Glasgow), Briefing Note, 3 July 2008, "Analysis of Government Expenditure and Revenues in Scotland (GERS) 2006-07 Publication", Main Point 2 and Table A: non-oil deficit revised £2.2bn in one year, £1.3bn from the methodology change alone. Read directly; archived..
- ONS, Living Costs and Food Survey technical report, financial year ending 2025, verbatim: achieved UK sample 4,998 households; overall GB response rate 26 per cent. Archived..
- Cuthbert, J.R. and Cuthbert, M., "A Constructive Critique of the Treasury's Country and Regional Analysis of Public Expenditure", Fraser of Allander Quarterly Economic Commentary 30(3), 2005, pp. 47-55; over £4bn of UK-level misallocation, corrected at the 2007-08 review; corroborated via jamcuthbert.co.uk (archived) and Roy and Spowage 2021, p. 10 (FOI mechanism)..
- Scottish Government, "Primary income accounts and gross national income (GNI): 1998-2021", Scottish National Accounts Programme, 28 June 2023: GNI roughly 90 to 94 per cent of GDP; causes verbatim (foreign ownership of North Sea operators, few UK headquarters, insurance and pensions sector with policyholders outside Scotland). Archived. The chapter states only the published ratio and the direction; no GNI-adjusted deficit percentage is printed..
- John Swinney, Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Sustainable Growth, ministerial press release on GERS, June 2008: "Scotland stands on a firm financial footing", as quoted in Roy and Spowage (2021), p. 7..
- Iain Macwhirter, "How Gers swapped shirts", Public Finance Magazine, 3 July 2008, as quoted in Roy and Spowage (2021), p. 7..
- Ian Lang letter, 3 March 1992: no documentary original has ever been produced, and the prose carries only what the official record holds. Stewart Hosie MP, HC Deb 8 January 2007, vol 455, c82, Statistics and Registration Service Bill second reading, reported speech, verbatim as printed. John Swinney MSP, Scottish Parliament Official Report, 10 January 2007, "Investment in Public Services" debate, col 30851, direct quotation, verbatim as printed. Wilson, A.J., "Stuck on the starting blocks: a response to Mr Steven's comment on the SNP General Election Budget 1997", Fraser of Allander Quarterly Economic Commentary 22(3), June 1997, p. 58 (Strathprints 52552, read in full): prints the words and attaches no footnote, citation or source; all twenty endnotes checked against their anchors. Roy and Spowage (2021), p. 5, cite Wilson..
- Two-number summary (raises 8.02 per cent, receives 9.08 per cent, population 8.01 per cent) and the spending-by-function shares: derived from ONS CRPSF FYE 2025 workbooks, validated in against and companions; all figures re-derived from the £m columns, not quoted.
- Per-head gap decomposition by function, 2024-25, in "The machine": ONS CRPSF FYE 2025 Tables S10 and S12, computed : health Scotland £3,552 against UK £3,500 per head, a gap of £52, 2.1 per cent of the total £2,489 per-head gap; social protection £648, economic affairs £405 (agriculture, fisheries, enterprise and transport are component lines within it), education £357, housing £226; defence zero, a population-apportioned line being level per head by definition. The book's own arithmetic; the parts sum to the total exactly.
- Office for Statistics Regulation, review of the public value of devolved public finance statistics: findings published 24 May 2019; recommendation to the devolved administrations (dated 30 September 2019) to "make plans to publish data about the public sector assets and liabilities within the next 5 years". Pulled directly..3.
- Roger Halliday, Scottish Government Chief Statistician, response to the OSR review, 20 December 2019, osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk, pulled directly, verbatim: "We put a lot of effort into this publication to ensure it is of sound quality"; a future publication "should include estimates for the value of assets and liabilities as well as better statistics on capital formation in general"; "very happy to work with others in developing these statistics over the next five years". The Code of Practice for Statistics commitment to statistics "free of political interference" via the same dossier..3, 2.3, 4.
- The alternative GERS sequence: Derek Mackay, SNP conference, October 2019 (announcement); shelved under Kate Forbes, c. 2020, pandemic resourcing cited by the Scottish Government; Humza Yousaf, leadership hustings, March 2023 (revival pledge); Scottish Government FOI release 202300353929, Chief Economist Directorate, 16 May 2023, pulled directly, verbatim: "There are no civil servants working on the 'alternative GERS' project", with information on a first publication date not held under s17(1) FOISA..3.
- Richard Murphy, taxresearch.org.uk, 13 August 2026, pulled directly, verbatim: "I have no idea. They are asked every year. They once promised a better version. No one can work out why they do not deliver."; "it really is time for the SNP to stop publishing this nonsense". Wayback-saved (see capture log above)..2.
- Council tax at 6.5 per cent of the UK total: GERS 2025-26 Table 1.3, Scottish outturn, 6.54 per cent; the freeze 2008-09 to 2016-17 inclusive and the 1991 valuation basis confirmed from gov.scot's own council tax consultation document.
- MOD, Regional expenditure statistics with industry 2024/25, published 11 September 2025, updated 13 March 2026, Official Statistics, workbook computed directly: Table 2 (Scotland £19,243m of the UK's £223,994m across 2015-16 to 2024-25, 8.59 per cent; 2024-25 alone £2,165m of £31,909m, 6.79 per cent); Table 11 (equipment 2024-25: Scotland £1,187m of £10,389m, 11.4 per cent, driven by Type 26 construction at BAE Systems Govan and Scotstoun). This series measures direct MOD payments to UK industry, not the whole of defence spending, and is not reconcilable pound for pound with the CRA's non-identifiable defence figures.; source page archived..2.
- HM Treasury, Statement of Funding Policy, 10th edition, November 2023: Annex B, paragraph 12, verbatim ("consistently only undertakes activities related to reserved policy"; the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office excluded from the comparability calculation altogether); departmental comparability table, Scotland column (Cabinet Office 0.0%, HM Treasury 0.0%, DESNZ 2.6%, DSIT 6.9%; every individual research council 0% in the Annex B programme tables).; archived..
- gov.uk press release, "Record £26 billion investment to transform UK naval bases' docking facilities and waterfront infrastructure", 14 July 2026: Project Royal Oak, £26bn over ten years across HMNB Clyde (Faslane), Devonport and Portsmouth; Faslane £15.1bn in the release's own text (the Scottish Secretary, quoted in the same release, gives £15.3bn; see Verification notes). Archived..3.
- GERS 2025-26, Chapter 3, "Expenditure per person", water footnote, verbatim: water and sewerage services "are provided by the public sector in Scotland, but by the private sector in England and Wales, leading to relatively higher spending in Scotland. This explains slightly less than one percentage point of the difference in spend." The £150 to £195 a head conversion (one percentage point of the UK's £19,561 per-head spending, £195.61, reduced for "slightly less") is the book's own arithmetic. Local capture
- Household water charges: Scottish Water charges announcements 2025-26 and 2026-27, pulled directly (average household charge £490 in 2025-26); Scottish Water Annual Report and Accounts 2024/25, financial statements read directly), cross-checked against DiscoverWater/Water UK (pulled directly) and CCW reporting..2-1.3.
- Scottish Government, Free Personal and Nursing Care, Scotland, 2024-25: estimated expenditure £1,029m across care at home and care-home payments; £185.50 a head is the book's own division by the ONS FYE2025 population. Search-corroborated; primary pull outstanding (see Verification notes)..1.
- England's care means test: upper capital limit £23,250, unchanged since 2010, gov.uk local authority circular 2025 to 2026 (search-corroborated); self-funded care-home fees in England, 2025: roughly £57,200 a year residential, £75,200 nursing, LaingBuisson-derived via secondary reporting (see Verification notes)..2-3.3.
- Tuition: SAAS fee payments (about £200m) plus the Scottish Funding Council teaching grant (£700m), together about £900m for 2023-24, £162 a head, established in.3; England's fee cap £9,535 from 2025-26, financed by income-contingent loans; the mirror entry (expected loan write-offs booked as government expenditure in the year of issue) from ONS, "Student loans in the public sector finances: a methodological guide", pulled and read directly; the student-loans capital line runs £116.6 a head UK-wide against £63.3 in Scotland (ONS CRPSF Table S8, computed)..
- Prescriptions, free in Scotland since April 2011: the printed figure is forgone charge revenue only, roughly £11 to £12 a head, from NHS England charge income of about £650m (2021-22) and £670m (2022-23), search-corroborated; charge £9.90 an item, prepayment certificate £114.50 a year; about 89 per cent of English items already dispensed free under exemptions. Not the gross drugs bill (England's community prescribing cost £10.9bn, NHSBSA Prescription Cost Analysis 2023/24, pulled directly)..
- Eye tests, free in Scotland since 2006: Scotland community eye care funding £144.5m (2026-27 budget); England's General Ophthalmic Services about £525m (2022-23); about £17 a head net, different years (see Verification notes); high-street test prices £25 to £30..
- The £360 to £570 a head total and its 13 to 21 per cent share of the £2,720 gap: the book's own addition and division.1, which places each item inside the existing function decomposition (water in housing and community amenities; prescriptions and eye tests in health; personal care in social protection; tuition in education) so no pound is counted twice against
- The £317 a head of accounting adjustments and its components (consumption of fixed capital, Renewables Obligation certificate flows, the imputed Housing Revenue Account subsidy, the student-loans offset): ONS CRPSF FYE 2025 Tables S7 and S8, computed, with the GERS and ONS definitions verbatim (non-cash items included as both revenue and expenditure)..
- The £800 to £1,000 a head unattributable remainder and the perhaps-two-thirds arithmetic.
- The household table: compiled from the sources above.
- HM Treasury, Needs Assessment Study, Report, December 1979, p.6 (relative need: England 100, Scotland 116, Wales 109, Northern Ireland 131; actual per-capita spending 1976-77: Scotland 122) and p.4 (the study's own stated principle); scope: the six main policy areas that were to be devolved, social security excluded. As quoted in HL Paper 139 Table 5 and House of Commons Library RP 98/8 p.13, cross-confirmed by the NI Fiscal Council's 2023 report and the Welsh Government's Barnett literature review, all citing the same primary figures. Shelved after the March 1979 referendum: HL 139 §28, verbatim ("the Needs Assessment Study was never pursued")..
- HM Treasury, Assessment of Relative Needs, Scotland, September 1993, chapter 4: unpublished; released to the House of Lords Select Committee on the Barnett Formula by HM Treasury in June 2009 (HL 139 §29 and fn.26). Figures from HL 139 Table 5: relative need Scotland 115 against England 100; actual per-capita spending 1993-94, 133. Neither the 1979 nor the 1993 study ever applied to set or adjust the baseline: confirmed without exception by every source in the dossier (RP 98/8; HL 139 §29))..
- HM Government, House of Lords Select Committee on the Barnett Formula: the Government's response, Cm 7772, December 2009, read directly.5, verbatim, "The Barnett formula determines changes to the baseline, not the baseline itself" and "The baseline is created by rolling forward existing spending in line with normal public spending practice"; §2.14, verbatim, "we believe that Scotland now has a markedly lower need than Wales and Northern Ireland in comparison with England. The current allocation of spending does not properly reflect this basic pattern across the devolved administrations"; §2.15 (keeping the matter "under review"); §2.13 (block grants paid to the devolved consolidated funds). Wayback-archived., 4-5.
- George Younger, evidence to the Select Committee on Scottish Affairs, 7 July 1980 (Scottish Aspects of the 1980-84 PEWP: Minutes of Evidence, HC 689 1979-80, Q.2), verbatim: the formula is "purely for the alteration of the programmes and not for the base line from which it starts". Via House of Commons Library Research Paper 98/8, 12 January 1998, p.7, read directly (Wayback-recovered PDF. RP 98/8 also carries the secrecy record (the formula's existence not on the public record until that 1980 session; Heald's naming of it)..
- House of Lords Select Committee on the Barnett Formula, First Report, HL Paper 139, 17 July 2009, official HTML edition recovered chapter by chapter via Wayback (.txt): §§23-27 (Barnett as Chief Secretary, 1978 devising, operating in Scotland and Northern Ireland from 1979; the Goschen ratio of 1888); §§28-29 and Table 5 (both needs assessment studies); §53 (the baseline never reviewed)..
- HM Treasury, Statement of Funding Policy, June 2025, read directly.2, verbatim, "Consolidated Funds should not have negative balances and should not have positive balances in excess of need"; §§10.20-10.24 (resource borrowing for forecast error and cash management, annual limit £629 million for 2025-26, cumulative £1.83 billion; capital borrowing separate). Wayback-archived..
- Scottish Affairs Committee, The Barnett Formula, HC 456, July 2025, para 9, the Committee's own words: "We are disappointed that representatives from neither HM Treasury nor the Scottish Government accepted our invitation to give oral evidence." Via, as carried in.
- London and the published comparison, in "The basis of the bill": HM Treasury CRA 2025 Table A.1a (non-identifiable expenditure £210,324m of £1,167,380m public sector expenditure on services, 2024-25; debt interest and defence together £186.0bn, 88.4 per cent of the pot, from Tables A.5c and A.6); CRA Table B.9 with ONS mid-2024 populations (the sub-function containing Parliament: London £473m of England's £2,942m, 16.1 per cent, against 15.5 per cent of England's population); CRA methodology workbook verbatim (Parliament and the NAO "Allocated by HMT on behalf of departments using statistical methodologies"; HMCTS national-level spend "allocated using the regional breakdown of other spending"; the museum rows "allocated using visitor survey data", already sourced above). London revenue £26,391 and surplus £5,374 per head: ONS CRPSF FYE 2025, Tables S4 and S5, already sourced above. No adjusted London figure is constructed, per the dossier's own recommendation..3, 2, 4-6.
- Full analytical dossier, compiled 24 August 2026; verification dossiers and; the GERS Audit itself at; the why-tolerate question at, compiled 24 August 2026; the funding-mechanics and baseline dossier at, compiled 25 August 2026; the London classification dossier at
- Publication review additions, 9 October 2026 (the advocate merge; each tag is the edit it sources): - (16-A04#1) Office for Budget Responsibility, Public finances databank, March 2026 Economic and fiscal outlook edition (workbook last modified 26 March 2026), sheet 'Aggregates (per cent of GDP)', column 'Public sector net borrowing', row 2009-10: 10.19..5). - (16-A06#1) Same as 06-A02: HMRC, Statistics of government revenues from UK oil and gas production, 24 September 2025, data tables, Table 2, 'Total Net Revenue', 1968 to 1969 through 2024 to 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68cacc612fe4b313286c9ffe/Government_revenues_from_oil_and_gas_production_September_2025_-_data_tables.ods; landing page archived https://web.archive.org/web/20261009093631/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/government-revenues-from-uk-oil-and-gas-production--2
Found a broken link or a fact that doesn't hold? Tell the publisher.